ecoliner.blogg.se - Darktable vs raw therapee

Darktable vs raw therapee pro#
Darktable vs raw therapee software#
Darktable vs raw therapee free#
Darktable vs raw therapee windows#

Darktable vs raw therapee software#

My conclusion: AMAZE is the best demosaicing algorithm for low ISO photos from the Coolpix A.Open-source software offers alternatives to popular photo editing software without a subscription or even a one-time cost. Moire is clearly a problem with this converter when developing real life photos. It's supposed to have the same engine which powers the Nikon NX-D but the results are absolute technicolour.

Darktable vs raw therapee pro#

SP7 (Silkypix Developer Studio Pro 7.0.2.1).What helped with the colour moire was the CA removal, but set its size to 2 (using the Auto setting is detrimental to colours). It's crucial NOT to use the Moire slider at Auto (here I didn't apply it at all, since it doesn't help much but it destroys quite large areas of colour in real life photos). Gets rid of colour moire quite well but leaves a lot of mess and artefacts (both mazing and speckling the dark and light speckles pretend detail and fool the eye to think the photo is sharper than it really is). The demosaicing is fairly dirty-looking, but it's visible in 200% magnification and doesn't really matter for everyday usage. Output sharpening wasn't applied, but it would've helped with the overall sharpness, making it even better than RT and CO. Sharpening was set to deconvolution: Amount 25, Radius 0.8, Detail 100. There are some mazing artefacts present in both versions. There are two versions: one with global controls only, and the other with the moire removal applied locally with a brush. Interestingly enough, there appeared the red dot artefacts like in your Darktable PPG conversion, which could imply that CO is using a similar demosaicing algorithm. So, potentially the result could be much, much better with this converter. I'd also use the LCC tool to get rid of the lens colour cast (i.e. Otherwise I'd zero the NR as it helps sharpness a lot and would run the CA analysis and used the moire slider (possibly brushing in the effect).

I have the Sony version so I can't do anything with the Coolpix A file except to convert it to tif. Settings: it's crucial to set the NR method to Better Quality 2013 and zero the sliders for low ISO the Moire reduction was set to low but it doesn't do anything so you can ignore this Lateral CA on USM RGB 10/3/0 Picture Control: Recorded value (i.e. Not surprisingly, it looks very similar to your OOC jpeg.

Darktable vs raw therapee free#

NX (the free Nikon Capture NX-D 1.3.0).

CA correction was left disabled because its results had a negative impact on moire. Crucial setting: Demosaicing strength set to Moderate. Mind you: this is a screenshot, so don't evaluate the sharpness of the file. It looks like it also uses something like the AMAZE demosaicing (it's very similar to your Darktable Amaze version. Note: like LR, the Camera WB is interpreted with some magenta bias (as compared with the more neutral NX and CO WB). My settings: crop Demosaicing: amaze with 1 false colour suppression step CA auto-correction on custom flat-field file for f/4 aperture Adobe Standard dcp colour profile with TC and Look table on Sharpening: RL Deconvolution at defaults except for the radius (0.65) Defringe: custom equlizer setting for magenta and green (that helped a lot!). Then I opened them in PSE and saved as quality 10 jpegs (so as to avoid jpeg compression discrepancies between the converters). I cropped inside each converter and developed the file to 8-bit, uncompressed, sRGB tiff (no output sharpening added).

Since the defaults are vastly different for each of them I've decided to apply a different methodology - getting the most out of each of them with respect to detail and optical corrections (subjective, I know).

Darktable vs raw therapee windows#

So, I've downloaded your raw file and converted it in 7 converters on the Windows 8.1.